|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 56-62
Pancreatic cancer in an Asian population
Pradermchai Kongkam1, Pichit Benjasupattananun1, Pongpeera Taytawat1, Patpong Navicharoen2, Viroj Sriuranpong1, Laddawan Vajragupta3, Naruemon Klaikaew4, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid1, Sombat Treeprasertsuk1, Rungsun Rerknimitr1, Pinit Kullavanijaya1
1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
3 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
4 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
|Date of Submission||03-Jul-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Sep-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||13-Feb-2015|
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background and Objectives: Most of the available data on pancreatic cancer are from Western countries. The aim was to characterize pancreatic cancer in Asian patients and to compare it with pancreatic cancer in Caucasians. Materials and Methods: Inpatients with histologically proven pancreatic cancer were retrospectively recruited at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2005 to December 2011. Results: The study enrolled 100 patients (male:female = 55:45, mean age 62.7 ± 12.9 years). The amount of time between symptom onset and disease diagnosis was 59.89 ± 63.12 days. The common presenting symptoms included abdominal pain or discomfort (71%), weight loss (70%), and jaundice (60%). Fifty-three of the 100 patients had stage 4 pancreatic cancer. The most common metastatic organ was the liver (n = 42, 79.25%). The survival rates after 1 and 3 years were 24 and 6%, respectively. The overall median time for survival was 5.1 months (range, 3 days to 62.4 months). According to the multivariate analysis, the staging at the time of diagnosis, serum albumin level, and tumor size were found to independently affect the survival rate. Twenty-two patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration with the sensitivity rate of 86.4% (19/22). Conclusion: Because pancreatic cancer in Asians may be clinically similar to the disease in Caucasians, the goals of future research of the disease may also be similar in the two populations.
Keywords: Pancreas, pancreatic cancer, presentation, prognosis, survival, treatment
|How to cite this article:|
Kongkam P, Benjasupattananun P, Taytawat P, Navicharoen P, Sriuranpong V, Vajragupta L, Klaikaew N, Ridtitid W, Treeprasertsuk S, Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P. Pancreatic cancer in an Asian population. Endosc Ultrasound 2015;4:56-62
|How to cite this URL:|
Kongkam P, Benjasupattananun P, Taytawat P, Navicharoen P, Sriuranpong V, Vajragupta L, Klaikaew N, Ridtitid W, Treeprasertsuk S, Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P. Pancreatic cancer in an Asian population. Endosc Ultrasound [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Jan 16];4:56-62. Available from: http://www.eusjournal.com/text.asp?2015/4/1/56/151361
| Introduction|| |
Despite being a relatively rare type of cancer, pancreatic cancer is ranked as the 8 th and 9 th leading cause of death in men and women, respectively.  This ranking is because pancreatic cancer has nonspecific symptoms in the early stages. Thus, this cancer is, usually, diagnosed when in the advanced stages; therefore, the curative treatment is ineffective. Commonly used noninvasive imaging modalities, including transabdominal ultrasounds and computed tomography (CT) scans, have a relatively low diagnostic yield for early pancreatic cancers, which are generally small.
Little information is available concerning the prognosis of pancreatic cancer, particularly in Asia. Most available studies have been epidemiological, and only a few studies have been conducted with active follow-ups. As the nature of pancreatic cancer in Eastern and Western countries may differ in various aspects, different treatments may be required. Diagnostic and treatment approaches for pancreatic cancer are gradually being developed to improve the pancreatic cancer survival rate. For now, most of the treatments in Asian countries utilize a multidisciplinary approach. Therefore, it is interesting to examine the effects of these treatments in relation to those used by Western countries.
Thus, this study was established in an attempt to demonstrate the clinical presentation and results of pancreatic cancer treatments in an Asian population using the survival rate as a key indicator. The study was set in a tertiary care hospital, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, in Bangkok, Thailand.
| Materials and Methods|| |
From January 2005 to December 2011, the medical registration records of inpatients at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were retrospectively searched for patients with an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10 th Revision (ICD-10) code of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ICD-10 code 25.0-25.9). Only the patients with histopathologically proven diagnoses were recruited into the study. The available relevant data, including age, gender, presenting symptoms, time frame, related blood tests, serum tumor markers, CT scan findings, tumor stage, and treatment mode, were collected and recorded in a data record form.
The survival time was recorded as the time elapsed from the initial diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma until the death of the patient. If the survival time could be reviewed and determined from the available medical records, it was used for the analysis. However, if no data were present, a researcher (Pichit Benjasupattananun, MD) directly contacted the patients' families by telephone to obtain the exact survival time. The protocol was approved by the Chulalongkorn University Institutional Review Board, Bangkok, Thailand.
All data were recorded and interpreted analytically to demonstrate the patients' characteristics, tumor stagings, treatment modes, and survival times.
All continuous variables were analyzed with a t-test, whereas the categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-squared test. The survival times were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier curve. The confounding factors for survival time were compared using the log-rank test.
| Results|| |
A total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria and were recruited into the study. The study population included 55 males and 45 females; the mean patient age at the time of diagnosis was 62.7 ± 12.9 years. Men and women were diagnosed at the mean ages of 61.76 ± 13.20 years and 63.78 ± 12.78 years, respectively. The number of patients diagnosed by age group is shown in [Figure 1]. The average length of time between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis was 59.89 ± 63.12 days, ranging from 5 to 365 days as shown in [Figure 2].
|Figure 1. The age distribution patients at the time of the pancreatic cancer diagnosis|
Click here to view
|Figure 2. Distribution of the patients with regard to the length of time between onset of symptoms and establishment of diagnosis. The average time was 59.89 ± 63.12 days, ranging from 5 to 365 days (data were not available for 4 of the patients)|
Click here to view
The patient's presenting symptoms included abdominal pain or discomfort (71%), weight loss (70%), jaundice (60%), itching (20%), palpable abdominal mass (14%), gut obstruction (4%), cholangitis (4%), incidental findings (3%), acute pancreatitis (2%), elevated serum tumor marker (2%), back pain (2%), fever (2%), steatorrhea (1%) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (1%).
The initial blood chemistry values were serum total bilirubin (10.4 ± 11.8 mg/dL), alkaline phosphate (383.7 ± 364.7 U/L) and cancer antigen 19-9 (690.3 ± 1397.7 IU/mL). All tumor characteristics, including the cell differentiation, cancer location in the pancreas, and stage at the time of diagnosis are presented in [Table 1]. The mean tumor diameter was 4.2 ± 1.9 cm (n = 83). The diagnostic imaging included transabdominal ultrasound (n = 43), CT scan (n = 96), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 11), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS, n = 13), and laparoscopy (n = 2).
|Table 1. The tumor characteristics of all patients recruited into the study|
Click here to view
Organ involvement included the liver in 42 patients (79.25%), the peritoneum, mesentery, omentum, or mesocolon in 11 patients (20.75%), the lungs in 8 patients (15.09%), the supraclavicular lymph node in 4 patients (7.55%), the adrenal gland in 1 patient (1.89%), bone in 1 patient (1.89%), the appendix in 1 patient (1.89%), and bone marrow in 1 patient (1.89%).
Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed in 22 patients. Malignant cells were identified in 19 patients. No malignant cell was seen in 2 patients. Atypical cells were identified in 1 patient. In summary, the sensitivity rate of EUS-FNA for diagnosing malignant pancreatic masses was 86.4%.
The study treatment modalities included curative surgery in 29 patients (i.e., 20 cases of Whipple's operation, 6 cases of pancreatectomy, and 3 cases of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy). Of these cases, 11 patients had undergone previous treatment modalities prior to the curative surgery, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with plastic stents in 9 patients and percutaneous transheptic biliary drainage (PTBD) in 2 patients.
Among the 29 patients who underwent curative surgery, 21 also received adjuvant therapy (72.4%): Adjuvant chemotherapy alone in 4 patients (13.8%), adjuvant radiotherapy alone in 4 patients (13.8%), adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in 5 patients (17.2%), and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in 8 patients (27.6%).
Seventy-one patients underwent palliative operations. The first modality of choice was bypass surgery in 12 patients, noncurative surgery in 5 patients, PTBD in 9 patients, and ERCP with stent insertion in 19 patients (9 with metallic stents and 10 with plastic stents). Seventeen patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, and 9 patients received the best supportive care. Later, several patients underwent bypass operations, leading to a total of 22 bypass operations.
Of the 71 patients who received palliative treatment, 38 (43.5%) patients also received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Of these patients, 19 patients (26.8%) underwent palliative chemotherapy; 5 patients (7%) underwent palliative radiotherapy; 7 patients (9.9%) underwent palliative concurrent chemoradiation, and 7 patients (9.9%) underwent both palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Of the 100 patients, 54 underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There were 64 chemotherapy regimens. The two most common regimens were single-agent gemcitabine in 37 patients (57.8%) and gemcitabine + oxaliplatin in 6 patients (9.4%), the chemotherapy-related complications included thrombocytopenia in 2 patients, leukopenia in 1 patient, severe hepatitis in 1 patient, and catheter-related infection in 1 patient.
Complications of treatment
Whipple's operation and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed for 23 patients, and postoperative complications were seen in 5 of the patients (21.7%), including an anastomosis leakage in 2 patients, wound infection in 2 patients, and a torn splenic hilum in 1 patient.
Bypass surgery was performed in 22 patients and resulted in complications in 5 of the patients (22.7%), consisting of acute cholangitis in 2 patients, anastomosis obstruction in 1 patient, surgical site bleeding in 1 patient, and wound infection in 1 patient.
Percutaneous transheptic biliary drainage was completed in 11 patients and was found to have complications in 2 patients (18.2%), consisting of tumor bleeding in 1 patient and PTBD obstruction in 1 patient.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed 31 times and resulted in complications in 8 patients (25.8%), including acute pancreatitis in 2 patients, acute cholangitis in 2 patients, acute pancreatitis and acute cholangitis in 1 patient, stent stenosis and acute cholangitis in 1 patient, upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 1 patient and duodenal perforation in 1 patient.
Survival rate and duration
The 1- and 3-year survival rates after pancreatic cancer diagnosis were 24% and 6%, respectively. The median survival times based on the staging, grading of adenocarcinoma, and first treatment are listed in [Table 2]. The overall median survival time was 5.1 months, with maximal survival duration of 62.37 months and a minimum of 3 days.
|Table 2. This table shows the three significant factors determining the survival rate of patients with pancreatic cancer. These factors include the staging of pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis, the pathology of the cancer and the initial treatment modalities|
Click here to view
We considered factors that could have affected the survival rate using a Kaplan-Meier curve by comparing the differences in a log-rank test as shown in [Figure 3]. Three factors were found to be statistically significant, including the staging of the pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis (P < 0.001), the pathology of the cancer (P < 0.001), and the first treatment modality that the patient received (P = 0.001).
|Figure 3. Survival duration versus the pancreatic cancer stage in the form of a Kaplan — Meier curve|
Click here to view
On univariate analysis, three factors were found to affect the survival rate : s0 erum albumin level (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.662; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.483-0.907; P = 0.01), the size of the tumor (HR: 1.166; 95% CI: 1.048-1.298; P = 0.005), and the staging at the time of diagnosis (HR: 1.818; 95% CI: 1.369-2.415; P < 0.001).
In the multivariate analysis of the 5 factors, i.e., the cancer staging at the time of diagnosis, pathology of the pancreatic cancer, first treatment modality, serum albumin level, and tumor size (based on 76 patients because of missing data), [Table 3] that affected the survival rate (from the Kaplan-Meier curve and the univariate analysis), only three independent factors affected the survival rate : t0 he staging at the time of diagnosis, serum albumin level, and tumor size at the time of diagnosis.
|Table 3. The factors affecting the survival rate of patients with pancreatic cancer, as determined by multivariate analysis|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
All patients in this study were Asian and lived in Thailand. Little is known about the demographic data, prognosis, and survival of pancreatic cancer in this part of the world, which makes this population an interesting population to explore. The demographic data of pancreatic cancer patients in our study are similar to those in many reports from Western nations. For example, the age and gender of the various populations are similar. , The data from this study indicated that this cancer was mostly found in patients between 60 and 70 years old. Few patients younger than 45 years were identified, and men were more prone to pancreatic cancer than women. This finding is comparable with the Caucasian data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries, which demonstrate that advancing age is the main risk factor for pancreatic cancer. (SEER Fact Sheets: Pancreas: http://seer.cancer.gov/). However, in this present study, number of patients in age group between 61 and 70 years old was highest. This might be due to the average age of Thai population is younger than that in Caucasian and elderly patients in Thailand probably did not come to our tertiary care hospital for treatment as they might prefer palliative treatment after discussion with primary physicians.
The three most common presenting symptoms in our series were pain, jaundice, and weight loss. This result is comparable with the results from a multi-institutional series of 185 patients from Spain.  Only 3% of the pancreatic cancers in our series were incidentally found. This result is similar to a study from the United States.  Therefore, based on the results of this study and others, the presentation of patients between 60 and 70 years old with unexplained abdominal pain, weight loss, and jaundice should raise a suspicion of pancreatic cancer, particularly when a solid pancreatic mass is present. However, it is impossible for clinicians to reliably diagnose pancreatic cancer based on symptoms and signs alone, as demonstrated in a classic prospective study.  An awareness of pancreatic cancer in patients with high-risks for pancreatic cancer and who present with suggestive symptoms is the only method of diagnosing early-stage pancreatic cancer.
The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer appears to depend on the diagnostic delay. In our study, we found that the time interval from the presentation of symptoms to the delivery of a diagnosis was between 2 and 4 weeks. An Italian study that focused on the prognostic role of a diagnostic delay found that the majority of patients had advanced disease. The symptoms of pain and weight loss were related to the shortest and longest mean times to diagnosis, respectively.  In our study, we did not analyze the effect of the time intervals between the presentation of symptoms and diagnosis on the survival rate. However, most of the patients in our study had symptoms and were in advanced stages of the disease at the time of diagnosis. This result suggests that diagnosing pancreatic cancer in the symptomatic stages is most likely too late. Therefore, detecting the cancer in the presymptomatic stages is a key factor to increasing the patient survival time.
The incidence of pancreatic cancer is somewhat low; therefore, screening for this cancer in an average-risk patient is not cost-effective. In fact, the surveillance of only high-risk patients is the suggested approach to increasing the survival rate of patients with pancreatic cancer.  EUS and MRI seem to be the best tools for the surveillance of early pancreatic cancer. , In our study, EUS and MRI were used in <20% of patients, whereas CT was the most commonly used imaging modality. This type of imaging is mainly used in patients who already have symptoms and are in the advanced stages, not for screening or surveillance purposes. For the staging of pancreatic cancer, CT is suggested as the optimal imaging modality to evaluate liver metastases, even in patients with small pancreatic cancers.  In conclusion, we determined that pancreatic cancer in our population has a poor prognosis, partly because of its delayed diagnosis and the lack of a surveillance protocol in our country.
Over the last decade, a multimodality approach has been used to improve the prognosis of pancreatic cancer, particularly for those patients who are not candidates for curative surgery. On the basis of our data, different primary modes of treatment provide significantly different survival results. However, based upon the disease stages and patient conditions, it is difficult to note which method affected the selection of treatment procedures. To directly compare the results of each treatment, the study must be well-controlled, and fair randomization should be applied to prevent selection bias. In our series, approximately 30% of our patients underwent curative surgery, which is similar to other large series.  Gemcitabine was the most commonly used chemotherapy in our series. Using gemcitabine alone for pancreatic cancer seems to provide a greater benefit over other chemotherapy modalities, as shown in other series.  Our study results indicate that the treatment plan for pancreatic cancer in this part of the world does not differ from those plans in other parts of the world.
Regarding the treatment complications in each modality in our series, PTBD appeared to have the lowest complication rate. However, PTBD is not a permanent treatment and is inconvenient for long-term patient care. In patients who are candidates for curative surgeries, such as Whipple's operation, the complication rate is approximately 20%, which is similar to that of other studies.  For patients who require bypass procedures (e.g., ERCP and palliative bypass surgery), the complication rates were quite similar, approximately 20%. In comparison with the reported complication rates of ERCP from a series of ERCPs with stent placement in patients with malignant distal biliary strictures, the complication rates aligned with ours. 
In our study, the 1-year survival rate was studied using the active follow-up method. Few studies have reported the survival rate using this method, ,,, whereas a majority of studies have calculated the survival rate using population-based data. ,,,,,,,,,,, Some studies have used a combination of these methods to calculate the survival rate.  Despite the often limited availability of certain advanced, sophisticated, diagnostic, and therapeutic measures that are used in the Western world, the survival rate in our patients is similar to the survival rates in these countries. This similarity may reflect the inherent biological behavior of the cancer around the world and the worldwide inability to diagnose the disease early in its course.
According to our study results, a prognostic factor that may impact patient survival is the degree of differentiation of the malignant cells. Poorly differentiated cells had worse prognoses, whereas the patients with well-differentiated cancer cells tended to survive longer. This result is similar to the results from Gray et al., who showed that 1 of the 4 main factors for early mortality following bypass surgery is the poor differentiation of cancer cells.  Nonetheless, after a multivariate analysis, the degree of cell differentiation did not seem to be a significant prognostic factor. However, as this study was not designed to directly answer this question, no final conclusions can be made based on the results of this study.
| Conclusion|| |
The data on pancreatic cancer in Asians from this series are comparable to the demographic data of Caucasians. With current multimodality treatments, the regimens and prognoses seem to be similar to those in Western countries. Pancreatic cancer remains a challenging disease to diagnose and treat. Future directions for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment in Asians should, therefore, adhere to the same regimen followed in Western countries. It is possible that the data obtained for each country can be applied to others.
| References|| |
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al
. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin
Anderson MA, Zolotarevsky E, Cooper KL, et al.
Alcohol and tobacco lower the age of presentation in sporadic pancreatic cancer in a dose-dependent manner: A multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol
Gobbi PG, Bergonzi M, Comelli M, et al.
The prognostic role of time to diagnosis and presenting symptoms in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol
Porta M, Fabregat X, Malats N, et al.
Exocrine pancreatic cancer: Symptoms at presentation and their relation to tumour site and stage. Clin Transl Oncol
Goodman M, Willmann JK, Jeffrey RB. Incidentally discovered solid pancreatic masses: Imaging and clinical observations. Abdom Imaging
DiMagno EP, Malagelada JR, Taylor WF, et al
. A prospective comparison of current diagnostic tests for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med
Harinck F, Poley JW, Kluijt I, et al
. Is early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer fiction? Surveillance of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer. Dig Dis
Kluijt I, Cats A, Fockens P, et al
. Atypical familial presentation of FAMMM syndrome with a high incidence of pancreatic cancer: Case finding of asymptomatic individuals by EUS surveillance. J Clin Gastroenterol
Kongkam P, Ang TL, Vu CK, et al.
Current status on the diagnosis and evaluation of pancreatic tumor in Asia with particular emphasis on the role of endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Satoi S, Yamamoto H, Takai S, et al.
Clinical impact of multidetector row computed tomography on patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreas
Geer RJ, Brennan MF. Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg
Burris HA 3 rd
, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al.
Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol
Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM. Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg
Bakhru M, Ho HC, Gohil V, et al.
Fully-covered, self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) in malignant distal biliary strictures: Mid-term evaluation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Wakeman CJ, Martin IG, Robertson RW, et al
. Pancreatic cancer: Management and survival. ANZ J Surg
Bramhall SR, Allum WH, Jones AG, et al
. Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: An epidemiological study. Br J Surg
Lefebvre AC, Maurel J, Boutreux S, et al.
Pancreatic cancer: Incidence, treatment and survival trends-1175 cases in Calvados (France) from 1978 to 2002. Gastroenterol Clin Biol
Pasquali C, Sperti C, Filipponi C, et al
. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Northeastern Italy: Incidence, resectability rate, hospital stay, costs and survival (1990-1992). Dig Liver Dis
Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, et al
. Pancreatic cancer: A report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg
Fesinmeyer MD, Austin MA, Li CI, et al.
Differences in survival by histologic type of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Søreide K, Aagnes B, Møller B, et al
. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Norway: Trends in incidence, basis of diagnosis and survival 1965-2007. Scand J Gastroenterol
Luke C, Price T, Karapetis C, et al
. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology and survival in an Australian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS, et al.
Pancreatic cancer in the general population: Improvements in survival over the last decade. J Gastrointest Surg
Cronin-Fenton DP, Erichsen R, Mortensen FV, et al
. Pancreatic cancer survival in central and Northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: A population-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol
2011;3 Suppl 1:19-25.
Lambe M, Eloranta S, Wigertz A, et al
. Pancreatic cancer; reporting and long-term survival in Sweden. Acta Oncol
Eloubeidi MA, Desmond RA, Wilcox CM, et al.
Prognostic factors for survival in pancreatic cancer: A population-based study. Am J Surg
Wood HE, Gupta S, Kang JY, et al.
Pancreatic cancer in England and Wales 1975-2000: Patterns and trends in incidence, survival and mortality. Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Zell JA, Rhee JM, Ziogas A, et al
. Race, socioeconomic status, treatment, and survival time among pancreatic cancer cases in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Faivre J, Forman D, Estève J, et al
. Survival of patients with primary liver cancer, pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer in Europe. EUROCARE Working Group. Eur J Cancer
Gong Z, Holly EA, Bracci PM. Survival in population-based pancreatic cancer patients: San Francisco Bay area, 1995-1999. Am J Epidemiol
Gray PJ Jr, Wang J, Pawlik TM, et al.
Factors influencing survival in patients undergoing palliative bypass for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Efficacy and safety of EUS biliary drainage in malignant distal and hilar biliary obstruction: A comprehensive review of literature and algorithm
| ||Stanley Khoo,NhanDuc Tri Do,Pradermchai Kongkam |
| ||Endoscopic Ultrasound. 2020; 9(6): 369 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Age comorbidity scores as risk factors for 90-day mortality in patients with a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Population-Based Study
| ||Ben-Chang Shia,Lei Qin,Kuan-Chou Lin,Chih-Yuan Fang,Lo-Lin Tsai,Yi-Wei Kao,Szu-Yuan Wu |
| ||Cancer Medicine. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Increasing pancreatic cancer is not paralleled by pancreaticoduodenectomy volumes in Brazil: a time trend analysis
| ||Lucila M. Perrotta de Souza,Jessica P.L. Moreira,Homero S. Fogaça,José Marcus Raso Eulálio,Ronir R. Luiz,Heitor S.P. de Souza |
| ||Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in gastroenterology: New horizons in search
| ||Satyarth Chaudhary,Si-Yu Sun |
| ||World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 23(27): 4892 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pancreatic Cancer Incidence and Lethality Rates in Brazil
| ||Lucila M. Perrotta de Souza,Jessica P.L. Moreira,Homero S. Fogaça,Ronir R. Luiz,Heitor S. de Souza |
| ||Pancreas. 2017; 46(5): 699 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
| ||Rapat Pittayanon,Pradermchai Kongkam,Rungsun Rerknimitr |
| ||Gastrointestinal Intervention. 2016; 5(3): 212 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||MicroRNA-140 regulates cell growth and invasion in pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma by targeting iASPP
| ||Shuai Liang,Xuejun Gong,Gewen Zhang,Gengwen Huang,Yebin Lu,Yixiong Li |
| ||Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. 2016; 48(2): 174 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|