• Users Online:397
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
TRAINING COURSE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 325-334

Diagnosis and staging of lung cancer with the use of one single echoendoscope in both the trachea and the esophagus: A practical guide


1 Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, Næstved; Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
3 Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
5 Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
6 Pulmonology Unit, “C.G. Mazzoni” Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
7 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch-Oderland, Strausberg; Brandenburg Institute for Clinical Ultrasound, Neuruppin, Germany
8 Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany
9 Medical Department, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Germany
10 Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland

Date of Submission14-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance14-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication02-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Christoph Frank Dietrich
Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kliniken Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Hirslanden, Bern 3036
Switzerland
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00139

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for allocation to surgical, medical or multimodal treatment. EUS and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) have gained ground in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in addition to radiological imaging (e.g., computed tomography, fluoroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging), nuclear medicine techniques (e.g. positron emission tomography, PET), combined techniques (e.g., fluorodesoxyglucosepositron emission tomography scanning), and sonographic imaging including conventional transcutaneous mediastinal and lung ultrasound. By using one single echoendoscope in both the trachea and the esophagus, surgical staging procedures (e.g. mediastinoscopy and video assisted thoracoscopy) can be avoided in a considerable proportion of patients with NSCLC.

Keywords: diagnosis; staging; echoendoscope


How to cite this article:
Clementsen PF, Bodtger U, Konge L, Christiansen IS, Nessar R, Salih GN, Kolekar S, Meyer CN, Colella S, Jenssen C, Herth F, Hocke M, Dietrich CF. Diagnosis and staging of lung cancer with the use of one single echoendoscope in both the trachea and the esophagus: A practical guide. Endosc Ultrasound 2021;10:325-34

How to cite this URL:
Clementsen PF, Bodtger U, Konge L, Christiansen IS, Nessar R, Salih GN, Kolekar S, Meyer CN, Colella S, Jenssen C, Herth F, Hocke M, Dietrich CF. Diagnosis and staging of lung cancer with the use of one single echoendoscope in both the trachea and the esophagus: A practical guide. Endosc Ultrasound [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];10:325-34. Available from: http://www.eusjournal.com/text.asp?2021/10/5/325/310490


  Introduction Top


Accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for allocation to surgical, medical, or multimodal treatment. EUS and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) have gained ground in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in addition to radiological imaging (e.g., computed tomography [CT], fluoroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging), nuclear medicine techniques (e.g., positron emission tomography [PET]), combined techniques (e.g., fluorodeoxyglucose-PET scanning), and sonographic imaging including conventional transcutaneous mediastinal and lung ultrasound. By using one single echoendoscope in both the trachea and the esophagus, surgical staging procedures (e.g., mediastinoscopy and video-assisted thoracoscopy) can be avoided in a considerable proportion of patients with NSCLC.

Transesophageal ultrasound is excellent for the left and lower paraesophageal structures plus structures under the diaphragm, whereas EBUS provides access to structures close to the large airways. Thus, the two procedures are complementary. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be performed either with a conventional curvilinear gastrointestinal echoendoscope (EUS) or by using the EBUS-scope in the esophagus (EUS-B).[1]

For mediastinal nodal staging in patients with suspected or proven NSCLC, combining EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and EUS-FNA/EUS-B-FNA is preferred over either test alone.[1] EUS-B-FNA is a safe and feasible procedure for the biopsy of the left adrenal gland,[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] lung tumors,[9] retroperitoneal lymph nodes (LNs), and the liver.[10] Furthermore, in case reports, it has been demonstrated that EUS-B-FNA makes it possible to take biopsies from pleura[11] and difficult-to-assess posterior mediastinal structures[12] and to aspirate ascites[13] and pericardial fluid.[14] Moreover, the small-caliber EBUS-scope may be preferential compared to the gastrointestinal echoendoscope for sampling of mediastinal and upper abdominal lesions in toddlers[15],[16],[17] and in adult patients with esophageal stenosis.[4],[18]

The traditional apprenticeship method has been the cornerstone of training for many years. Trainees observe experienced practitioners and train under supervision to acquire the necessary skills and competences. Unfortunately, this approach results in prolonged procedure time and increased risk of complications.[19]

Individual learning curves for EUS-B-FNA and EBUS-TBNA vary a lot with the number needed to overcome the initial learning curve of EBUS ranging from 10 to 100 in different studies (mean: 37–44 procedures).[20] Simulation-based training provides a safe environment to develop and refine technical skills before performing the procedures in patients.[21] No patient wants to be a part of a learning curve.


  How to Learn Endobronchial Ultrasound Top


The European Respiratory Society (ERS) has launched a structured training program on EBUS-TBNA, comprising a three-part comprehensive process build on the best available evidence in medical education.[22] Part 1 is a theoretical introduction comprising self-directed online modules and a course, including lectures and live transmissions of procedures. This part ends with a theoretical test developed and externally reviewed by international experts in the field. Part 2 consists of intensive simulation-based training and clinical observation at selected European centers. The operators practice on the GI Bronch Mentor simulator (Simbionix®, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) using a training program that was proven superior to initial apprenticeship training in an international randomized controlled trial.[23] The simulation-based training ends with a validated simulator test.[24] Part 3 is performing procedures under supervised training in the clinical setting. The basis for the educational program is to use a systematic approach using the six defined home base landmarks, see below (The anatomical home base landmark scheme),[25] and each participant finishes the entire training program by submitting videotaped procedures following this approach for final assessment. These assessments are done by an international panel of blinded raters using the validated EBUSAT assessment tool for measuring competences.[23] Each of the three tests mentioned above (i.e., the theoretical test, the simulation-based test, and the clinical test) has established standards for competency that must be met. This competency-based approach is superior to the procedure-based approach in earlier guidelines on training requirements for EBUS that suggested forty procedures for acquisition of competence.[26] However, a certain (arbitrary) number of procedures does not ensure basic competency as all trainees learn at different paces. The newest European guidelines[1] recommend that competency in EBUS-TBNA as well as EUS-(B)-FNA for staging lung cancer should be ensured using validated assessment tools [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The European Respiratory Society has launched a structured training program on EBUS-TBNA, comprising a three-part comprehensive process. EBUS-TBNA: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Click here to view



  How to Learn Transesophageal Ultrasound With the Use of Endobronchial Ultrasound Endoscope Top


Unfortunately, no simulator for education in transesophageal ultrasound for lung cancer diagnosis and staging exists in contrast to what is the case for EBUS. Therefore, we still have to practice transesophageal ultrasound on patients. The only study exploring learning curves for EUS-FNA for lung cancer staging found that acquisition of skills varied between operators and that twenty procedures were not enough to ensure basic competency.[27] We do not have data for EUS-B-FNA, but probably the results would be similar. We recommend using the EUSAT assessment tool for assessing technical ability.[28] Due to the absence of EUS-B simulator, we recommend to learn EBUS-TBNA (see above) before learning EUS-B-FNA. Due to the difficulty level for EUS-B-FNA,[29] we recommend learning transesophageal ultrasound in the mediastinum in patients with abnormal mediastinal tumors and/or LNs before starting the search for small structures below the diaphragm. We recommend to use a systematic approach using the six landmarks, see below (The anatomical home base landmark scheme).[30]


  The Endobronchial Ultrasound Equipment, a Short Description Top


The integration of flexible bronchoscopy and EUS technology allows conventional endoscopic imaging simultaneously side by side with the radial or longitudinal sonographic view. The corresponding alignment of side-viewing optics and curvi-linear transducer of the EBUS scope is the prerequisite for sampling of mediastinal LNs and other suspcicious lesions for improved staging. The equipment is produced by three companies [Table 1]. EBUS uses frequencies of 5–12 MHz with a theoretical depth of penetration up to 120 mm. It is recommended to use 7.5 MHz as a routine and change the frequency, if necessary. The endoscopic and ultrasound images are delivered simultaneously, and they allow a precise visualization of the mucosa and of the tracheobronchial landmarks and a high definition of the ultrasound images. EBUS systems can perform elastography for tissue analysis[31],[32],[33],[34] as well as contrast-enhanced Doppler EBUS.[35] The procedure is performed with a dedicated needle assembly, which consists of a long steel needle, a sheath, and a handle for manipulation of the needle. The needle assembly is attached to the working channel of the endoscope. After the lesion has been outlined, the needle is advanced under real-time ultrasonic guidance. Aspiration needles are available for EBUS-scopes with a diameter of 25, 22, and 21 Gauge (G), with a meta-analysis demonstrating no significant differences in terms of diagnostic yield, sample adequacy, safety, and mean number of needle passes between 21 and 22G needles.[36] Flexible 19G needles are available for EBUS-scopes with a working channel of 2.2 mm.[37] A higher tissue yield was claimed for the larger needle diameter, but clinical relevance with regard to predictive biomarker analyses is still unproven.[38] Experience with core-biopsy needles designed for use with EBUS-scopes[39],[40],[41] and EBUS-guided intranodal forceps biopsy[41] is still limited.
Table 1: Established EBUS equipment

Click here to view



  Needles Top


A detailed description of different needle types is beyond the scope of this paper. Most often, a 22G needle is used, but other sizes are also available. Different companies produce needles, that are slightly different, but the main principles when using them are the same.[42] Some studies have shown that needle gauge size has no significant impact on diagnostic yield. However, in selected cases where additional tissue may be needed, sampling with a 19G EBUS needle following standard aspiration with a 22G needle results in an increase in the diagnostic yield.[43] In a randomized study including 500 subjects undergoing EBUS-TBNA, the efficacy of 19G was similar to that of 21G needle.[44] The criteria for selecting the appropriate needle type depending on the sampling indication are still under debate.


  Anatomy Top


A detailed description of the anatomy is beyond the scope of this paper, and we refer to textbooks. Knowledge of endosonographic anatomy and its relation to the TNM lung cancer staging system is crucial, but not all anatomical borders have clinical relevance in staging of the lung cancer patient. In a patient with NSCLC and N1 disease, surgery may be relevant, which is normally not the case for N2 disease. Thus, the border between stations 10 and 11 is not clinically relevant because both stations represent N1 (or N3, if located contralaterally to the primary tumor) disease. In contrast to this, the border between stations 4L and 10L is essential in a patient with a left-sided lung tumor as it denotes the border between N2 and N1 disease. Similarly, the border between stations 4R and 10R is essential in a patient with a right-sided lung tumor. Furthermore, for obvious reasons, it is mandatory to know the border between right- and left-sided LN stations. Incorrect upstaging could prevent the patient from receiving potentially curative therapy, and incurrent downstaging may cause the patient to undergo unnecessary surgery. Therefore, we should remember the following three important borders:

  1. The border between stations 4R and 10R is the lower border of the azygos vein
  2. The border between stations 4L and 10L is the upper border of the left pulmonary artery
  3. The border between stations 4R and 4L is the left border of the trachea. Thus, a LN located in front of the trachea may be station 4R.



  Before You Start Top


Check before starting the procedure that the endoscope as well as the ultrasonic picture and the endoscopic picture are all functioning satisfactory and that the wished frequency and depth are chosen. Check that the dot on the ultrasonic picture is located on the right side of the picture. It shows you where the proximal part of the endoscope is located. If the dot accidentally is on the left side, the ultrasonic picture is inverted, which may be confusing. Let the dot stay on the right side also when you proceed to EUS-B even if most gastroenterologists prefer the dot on the left side.[45] EBUS (-TBNA) and EUS-B (-FNA) may be performed with the patient in the supine position (preferred position for the pulmonologist), but also with the patient lying on his left side (preferred by the gastroenterologist).


  How to Perform Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Top


Following a conventional bronchoscopy, the operator introduces the EBUS-endoscope in the airways. Remember that you cannot see straight because the transducer is in the way. It can be difficult to get access to the trachea with an aggravated vision. If you see the vocal cords in the middle of the picture, you will have to bend the tip of the endoscope forward until they are in the lower part of the picture, and then you can proceed. The operator performs a systematic EBUS with localization of the six landmarks before searching for other structures:

  1. Find the landmarks in the following order: 4 L→7→10 L→10R→azygos→4R before starting to look for other structures
  2. Take the biopsies in the following order: N3→N2→N1→lung tumor to prevent an accidentally upstaging of the patient with lung cancer.



  HOW to Perform EUS-B-FNA Top


Thereafter, the operator can introduce the EBUS-endoscope into the esophagus and continue with an EUS-B procedure. Retract the EBUS scope from the trachea to a level just above the vocal cords and turn it slightly to the left and backward in the patient under very gentle pressure and encourage the patient to swallow. Right rotation (clockwise) of the handle moves the transducer to the right side of the body, when the transducer is directed ventrally, that is, it is above the diaphragm. Right rotation moves the transducer to the left side of the body when the transducer is directed dorsally, that is, it is below the diaphragm.

  1. Find the landmarks in the following order: liver→ abdominal aorta→left adrenal gland→7→4 L→4R before starting to look for other structures
  2. Take the biopsies in the following order: M1b→N3→N2→N1→lung tumor.


Use a new needle when you shift from EBUS to EUS-B if necessary, that is, do not risk moving malignant cells from the mediastinum to structures that may upstage the patient accidentally. In the case of one-needle approach, EUS-B is recommended first and thereafter proceed to EBUS. We recommend to sample in the order as follows to avoid relevant needle tract seeding: “M1b → N3 → N2 → N1 → lung tumor” independently from the location of the EBUS scope in the airways or in the upper gastrointestinal tract. For each sample, we give the information of the sampled station and in addition the needle pathway (transgastric, transesophageal, transbronchial, and transtracheal) to avoid any confusion. Others recommend using a new needle when shifting from structures below the diaphragm to structures above or if you biopsy at different locations, but there is no supportive published evidence.


  The Anatomical Home Base Landmark Scheme Top


Two sets of six anatomically defined home base landmarks (HBLs) each serve as the basis for simulation and hands-on- training, for assessment and certification of examiners and for standardisation of examination in clinical practice. The identification of HBL is helpful if the orientation is lost during imaging. Systematic clockwise or counterclockwise rotation of the echoendoscope tip and angulation of the instrument should be performed from each position to ascertain close contact with the tracheobronchial wall. Instead of trying to remember and understand all anatomical structures at once, you should start by learning the six simple landmarks for EBUS and EUS-B that you could always go back to.

The six endobronchial ultrasound landmarks

The six EBUS landmarks are shown in [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
Figure 2: Station 4L, simulator (a) and ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view
Figure 3: Station 7, simulator (a) and ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view
Figure 4: Station 10L, simulator (a) and ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view
Figure 5: Station 10R, simulator (a) and ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view
Figure 6: Station azygos vein, simulator (a) and Doppler ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view
Figure 7: Station 4R, simulator (a) and ultrasound (b) picture

Click here to view


Seek out the six EBUS landmarks systematically in the order mentioned.

  1. Station 4L: Turn the endoscope counterclockwise and look for station 4L between the arch of the aorta and the left pulmonary artery. These vessels resemble the ears of Mickey Mouse – the so-called Mickey Mouse window [Figure 2]
  2. Station 7: lies below the carina, with the EBUS scope in the right or the left main bronchus facing medially [Figure 3]
  3. Station 10L: look upward with the transducer in the left upper lobe bronchus. Search for the upper part of the left pulmonary artery, which forms the boundary between station 4L and 10L [Figure 4]
  4. Station 10R: look upward with the transducer in the right upper lobe bronchus searching close to the right main bronchus. Station 10R lies caudal to the inferior border of the azygos vein close to the right main bronchus [Figure 5]
  5. The azygos vein: Look for the azygos vein by turning the transducer to the right in the trachea [Figure 6]. Note that the azygos vein is in communication with the superior vena cava – this can be demonstrated by turning the scope counterclockwise
  6. Station 4R: This LN is found at the right or in front of the trachea above the azygos vein. The inferior border of the azygos vein marks the inferior border of station 4R [Figure 7].


The six EUS-B landmarks

The six EUS-B landmarks are shown in [Figure 8],[Figure 9],[Figure 10],[Figure 11],[Figure 12],[Figure 13].
Figure 8: EUS-B (left) liver

Click here to view
Figure 9: EUS-B abdominal aorta using B-mode (a) and color Doppler (b)

Click here to view
Figure 10: EUS-B left adrenal gland

Click here to view
Figure 11: EUS-B station 7, ultrasound elastography picture of a large lymph node with soft hilum (upper right, red and green colors) and stiffer lymph node parenchyma (blue)

Click here to view
Figure 12: EUS-B Station 4L, conventional B-mode ultrasound (a) and biopsy (b)

Click here to view
Figure 13: EUS-B station 4R, conventional B-mode ultrasound

Click here to view


Seek out the six EUS-B landmarks systematically in the order mentioned:

  1. The liver: Introduce the endoscope into the esophagus and slide down. Turn the handle slightly counterclockwise and find the left liver lobe with the liver veins [Figure 8]
  2. Aorta: Then turn the endoscope clockwise until the abdominal aorta with the origins of celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery is found. If you get lost, you can always go back to this position [Figure 9]
  3. The left adrenal gland: Now, turn the endoscope further clockwise and press the big wheel gently until you find the left adrenal gland close to the upper pole of the left kidney. The left adrenal gland resembles a bird [a seagull, Figure 10]
  4. Station 7: Go to the mediastinum by retracting the endoscope, where you find the subcarinal LN, station 7, between the left atrium and the right pulmonary artery [Figure 11]
  5. Station 4L: Retract the endoscope a little bit until you see the reflections from the trachea as parallel black and white lines. By counterclockwise rotation, station 4L is located between the aortic arch and the left pulmonary artery [Figure 12]
  6. Station 4R: Rotate clockwise until you pass the trachea and find the azygos vein. Where it disappears into the superior caval vein, you find station 4R. However, it is often hidden behind the trachea [Figure 13].



  Indications Top


The focus of the present paper is the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. For other indications, please see the papers of Colella et al.[42] and Jenssen et al.[30] In short, the European guidelines[1] give the following recommendations when focusing at five clinical situations:

  1. Abnormal mediastinum and/or hilar nodes at CT and/or PET in a patient with suspected or proven NSCLC: The combination of EBUS-TBNA and EUS, with the use of a gastrointestinal (EUS-FNA) or EBUS (EUS-B-FNA) scope, is preferred over either test alone. If the combination of EBUS and EUS-(B) is not available, EBUS alone is acceptable. Subsequent surgical staging is recommended, when endosonography does not show malignant nodal involvement
  2. No mediastinal involvement at CT and/or PET/CT in patients with suspected or proven peripheral NSCLC: EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-(B)-FNA should be performed, provided that one or more of the following conditions are present: (a) enlarged or fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-avid ipsilateral hilar nodes; (b) primary tumor without FDG uptake; and (c) tumor size ≥3 cm
  3. No involvement of mediastinal or hilar node plus lung tumor <3 cm in size at CT and/or PET/CT in patients with suspected or proven peripheral NSCLC: Initiation of therapy without further mediastinal staging is suggested
  4. No involvement of mediastinal or hilar nodes plus centrally located lung tumor at CT and/or PET in patients with suspected or proven NSCLC: It is suggested to perform EBUS-TBNA with or without EUS-(B)-FNA
  5. Re-staging: For mediastinal nodal re-staging following neoadjuvant therapy, EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-(B)-FNA is suggested for detection of persistent nodal disease, but, if this is negative, subsequent surgical staging is indicated.


A complete assessment of mediastinal and hilar nodal stations (all the above situations except[3]) includes sampling of at least three different mediastinal nodal stations (4R, 4L, and 7) as well as abnormal LNs as suggested by CT or PET-CT.[1] In patients with a centrally located lung tumor not visible at conventional bronchoscopy, sampling guided by endosonography is suggested, provided the tumor is located immediately adjacent to the larger airways (EBUS) or esophagus (EUS-[B]).[1]


  Contraindications Top


In all patients undergoing invasive procedures, careful attention to antithrombotic therapy that may increase the risk of bleeding must be kept in mind, for example in patients with mechanical heart valves, atrial fibrillation, or deep-vein thrombosis. The indication must be balanced with the contraindication. Contraindications to EBUS and EUS-B are recent myocardial infarction or ischemia, poorly controlled heart failure, significant hemodynamic instability, severe exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, and severe coagulopathy.


  Technical Details of Sampling, Specimen Preparation, and Processing Top


The technical performance of tissue acquisition as well as handling and preparation of tissue samples is described in detail in recent guidelines.[46],[47],[48] In short, the quality of samples may be influenced by several factors, such as size and type of the needle, number of needle passes, use of suction or slow-pull technique, availability of rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE), and specimen processing (smear cytology, liquid cytology, and cell-bock technique). However, evidence is limited and confined only to EBUS-TBNA [Table 2]. For EUS-guided sampling, a complementary approach combining cytopathological and histopathological processing is recommended to optimize diagnostic yield.[46],[49] However, evidence for this approach is only preliminary for EBUS-TBNA.[50] Specimen obtained for the diagnosis of lung cancer using EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA should be adequate for immunohistochemical staining including PD-L1 analysis and for molecular profiling. Therefore, for molecular evaluation, additional passes, needles yielding a higher amount of tumor cells (19G, core needles), or histological processing (cell-block) may be useful approaches.[46],[48]
Table 2: Factors potentially influencing the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


Using a single echoendoscope in both the trachea (EBUS) and the esophagus (EUS-B) allows mediastinal staging of lung cancer in one procedure.

This “single-scope, double investigation” with the EBUS equipment can be performed safely after conventional bronchoscopy in the same session. Evidence-based simulator training is recommended and is – concerning EBUS – offered via the European Respiratory Society. No EUS-B simulator training is available despite an apparent need and increasing interest.

Acknowledgments

Simulator pictures: Image Courtesy of 3D Systems, Simbionix. Thank you for technical help to the medical students Anishan Vamadevan and Kristoffer Cold at CAMES.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Vilmann P, Clementsen PF, Colella S, et al. Combined endobronchial and esophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, in cooperation with the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Endoscopy 2015;47:545-59.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Christiansen IS, Ahmad K, Bodtger U, et al. EUS-B for suspected left adrenal metastasis in lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:258-63.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dietrich CF, Correas JM, Dong Y, et al. WFUMB position paper on the management incidental findings: Adrenal incidentaloma. Ultrasonography 2020;39:11-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. Transgastric endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with esophageal narrowing using the ultrasonic bronchovideoscope. Dis Esophagus 2011;24:458-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound of the adrenal glands. Ultraschall Med 2010;31:228-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Barreiros AP, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging of adrenal masses. Ultraschall Med 2010;31:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Trojan J, Schwarz W, Sarrazin C, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of small adrenal masses. Ultraschall Med 2002;23:96-100.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dietrich CF, Wehrmann T, Hoffmann C, et al. Detection of the adrenal glands by endoscopic or transabdominal ultrasound. Endoscopy 1997;29:859-64.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Skovgaard Christiansen I, Kuijvenhoven JC, Bodtger U, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of paraesophageally located lung lesions. Respiration 2019;97:277-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Christiansen IS, Bodtger U, Naur TM, et al. EUS-B-FNA for diagnosing liver and celiac metastases in lung cancer patients. Respiration 2019;98:428-33.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Bibi R, Bodtger U, Nessar R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy in the hands of the pulmonologist. Respirol Case Rep 2020;8:e00517.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ray A, Jain SR, Narwal A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration with an echobronchoscope (EUS-B-FNA) from a difficult-to-access paraspinal lesion. Lung India 2019;36:457-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Nessar R, Toennesen LL, Bodtger U, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ascites aspiration in the hands of the chest physician using the EBUS endoscope in the oesophagus. Respir Med Case Rep 2020;29:100998.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Christiansen IS, Clementsen PF, Petersen JK, et al. Aspiration of pericardial effusion performed with EUS-B-FNA in suspected lung cancer. Respiration 2020;99:686-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mehta R, Biraris P, Shivakumar S, et al. Transesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA)-Pushing the boundaries in the diagnosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017;52:E91-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Madan K, Garg P, Kabra SK, et al. Transesophageal Bronchoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in a 3-Year-Old Child. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2015;22:347-50.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gulla KM, Gunathilaka G, Jat KR, et al. Utility and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration and endoscopic ultrasound with an echobronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration in children with mediastinal pathology. Pediatr Pulmonol 2019;54:881-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gupta K, Mallery S. Small-caliber endobronchial ultrasonic videoscope: Successful transesophageal and transgastric FNA after failed passage of a standard ultrasonic endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:574-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Stather DR, Maceachern P, Chee A, et al. Trainee impact on advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy: An analysis of 607 consecutive procedures in an interventional pulmonary practice. Respirology 2013;18:179-84.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, et al. Training and proficiency in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: A systematic review. Respirology 2017;22:1547-57.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Naur TM, Konge L, Nayahangan LJ, et al. Training and certification in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:2118-23.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Farr A, Clementsen P, Herth F, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound: Launch of an ERS structured training programme. Breathe (Sheff) 2016;12:217-20.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Konge L, Clementsen PF, Ringsted C, et al. Simulator training for endobronchial ultrasound: A randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J 2015;46:1140-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Konge L, Annema J, Clementsen P, et al. Using virtual-reality simulation to assess performance in endobronchial ultrasound. Respiration 2013;86:59-65.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Dietrich CF, Annema JT, Clementsen P, et al. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:E311-25.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bolliger CT, Mathur PN, Beamis JF, et al. ERS/ATS statement on interventional pulmonology. European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society. Eur Respir J 2002;19:356-73.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Konge L, Annema J, Vilmann P, et al. Transesophageal ultrasonography for lung cancer staging: Learning curves of pulmonologists. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1402-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Konge L, Vilmann P, Clementsen P, et al. Reliable and valid assessment of competence in endoscopic ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Endoscopy 2012;44:928-33.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Vilmann P, Săftoiu A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: Equipment and technique. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;21:1646-55.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Jenssen C, Annema TJ, Clementsen P, et al. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part II: Mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:439-58.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sun J, Zheng X, Mao X, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound elastography for evaluation of intrathoracic lymph nodes: A pilot study. Respiration 2017;93:327-38.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Herth FJ. Endobronchial ultrasound elastography. Endosc Ultrasound 2016;5:233-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Dietrich CF. Real-time tissue elastography. Multiple clinical applications. Multiple clinical solutions. Endoskopie Heute 2012;24:177-212.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Dietrich CF, Bibby E, Jenssen C, Saftoiu A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Havre RF. EUS elastography: How to do it? Endosc Ultrasound 2018;7:20-28.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
35.
Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound: Potential value of a new method. Endosc Ultrasound 2017;6:43-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Giri S, Pathak R, Yarlagadda V, et al. Meta-analysis of 21- versus 22-G aspiration needle during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2015;22:107-13.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
He T, Mehta AC. Linear endobronchial ultrasound: What's new? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2018;39:649-60.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Wolters C, Darwiche K, Franzen D, et al. A prospective, randomized trial for the comparison of 19-G and 22-G endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial aspiration needles; introducing a novel end point of sample weight corrected for blood content. Clin Lung Cancer 2019;20:e265-73.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
McCracken DJ, Bailey M, McDermott MT, et al. A retrospective analysis comparing the use of ProCore® with standard fine needle aspiration in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Ir J Med Sci 2019;188:85-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Yang L, Gu Y, Wang H, Yu D, et al. Novel ProCore 25-gauge needle for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration reduces the puncture time and frequency, with comparable diagnostic rate for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Thorac Cancer 2020;11:748-53.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Cheng G, Mahajan A, Oh S, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy (EBUS-IFB)-technical review. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:4049-58.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Colella S, Clementsen PF, Gurioli C, et al. Endobronchial-ultrasound needle aspiration and endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration in thoracic diseases. Pathologica 2016;108:59-79.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Garrison G, Leclair T, Balla A, et al. Use of an additional 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle increases the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2018;25:269-73.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Tenda ED, Aboelhassan AM, Kontogianni K, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle (Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA) in the assessment of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy: A randomised trial. Eur Respir J 2019;54:PA324.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Dietrich CF, Arcidiacono PG, Braden B, et al. What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II). Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:360-9.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV-EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version). Ultraschall Med 2016;37:E33-76.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
van der Heijden EH, Casal RF, Trisolini R, et al. Guideline for the acquisition and preparation of conventional and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for the diagnosis and molecular testing of patients with known or suspected lung cancer. Respiration 2014;88:500-17.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Wahidi MM, Herth F, Yasufuku K, et al. Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016;149:816-35.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline-March 2017. Endoscopy 2017;49:989-1006.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Vaidya PJ, Saha A, Kate AH, et al. Diagnostic value of core biopsy histology and cytology sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes using 21-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle. J Cancer Res Ther 2016;12:1172-7.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, et al. Impact of Rapid On-Site Cytological Evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic yield of transbronchial needle aspiration during mediastinal lymph node sampling: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2018;153:929-38.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Pickering EM, Holden VK, Heath JE, et al. Tissue acquisition during EBUS-TBNA: comparison of cell blocks obtained from a 19G versus 21G needle. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2019;26:237-44.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Chaddha U, Ronaghi R, Elatre W, et al. Comparison of sample adequacy and diagnostic yield of 19- and 22-G EBUS-TBNA needles. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2018;25:264-8.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Lee HS, Lee GK, Lee HS, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: How many aspirations per target lymph node station? Chest 2008;134:368-74.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Lin X, Ye M, Li Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of suction and inner-stylet of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. BMC Pulm Med 2018;18:192.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Scholten EL, Semaan R, Illei P, et al. Stylet use does not improve diagnostic outcomes in endobronchial ultrasonographic transbronchial needle aspiration: A randomized clinical trial. Chest 2017;151:636-42.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Casal RF, Staerkel GA, Ost D, et al. Randomized clinical trial of endobronchial ultrasound needle biopsy with and without aspiration. Chest 2012;142:568-73.  Back to cited text no. 57
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   How to Learn End...
   How to Learn Tra...
   The Endobronchia...
  Needles
  Anatomy
  Before You Start
   How to Perform E...
   HOW to Perform E...
   The Anatomical H...
  Indications
  Contraindications
   Technical Detail...
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1987    
    Printed80    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded109    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]